Just a quick linkdump, cause I’m busy

The Guardian has an interview with Stephenie Meyer about Twilight, The Host, true love and feminism among other things. It’s an interesting interview – pity about the positively hateful comments. However, what bothers me a little is that Stephenie continues to peddle the “I’n just a mother and housewife who never took a writing class” line, when that’s not the whole story. According to Dave Farland, she was one of the students in his creative writing workshop.

Talking of writing advice, Steve Hockensmith, author of several of those “classic literature with zombies mash-ups”, states how Elmore Leonard’s (or any author’s, really) ten rules for writing only teach you to write like Elmore Leonard. Which is okay, if that’s what you want. But if you want to write like yourself, you will have to find your own path and your own rules. This post really resonated with me, because I’ve always found Elmore Leonard’s much quoted rules problematic and for much the same reason as Steve Hockensmith. I can’t even read Elmore Leonard (sorry, but he does nothing for me and I tried), so why on Earth would I want to write like him?

Lady Business has a lengthy post with lots of data about a topic that regularly comes up once a year or so, namely the continuing gender gap in reviews (here of SFF books), since more books by men than by women are getting reviewed. Lots of good stuff there, including debunking the usual “I only read good books” (which just happen to be written exclusively by male writers – duh) arguments that tend to come up in these discussions.

It appears there is a bit of a backlash against the current trend of bloggers, usually male, reenacting cover poses, usually featuring female characters and often on books by female writers, at least going by this post by Arnie Fenner at Muddy Colors. Considering I have issues with this cover reenacting trend myself (I was going to write a longer post, but didn’t get around to it yet), I’m glad to see a dissenting post. Don’t get me wrong, it was fun the first time around, but by now it gets somewhat annoying, especially since the targets are almost always urban fantasy novels, overwhelmingly written by women. And the last thing the SFF genre needs is more vitriol poured out over an already marginalized subgenre. Never mind that recasting a subgenre that is largely written and read by women and features plenty of female main characters as a hotbed of sexism, just because you don’t like the covers, is problematic. And for the record, I like lots of urban fantasy covers, including some of those singled out for the cover reenactment treatment.

Posted in Books, Links | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Winter Wonderland at Springtime

Since, as reported yesterday, winter returned this weekend for one last hurray, I took the chance to go hiking in the snowy winterwoods one more time. And of course, I also took some photos. The location is once again the Westermark forrest near Syke in North West Germany, familiar from earlier snowy forrest photo posts.

I also saw some deer and a woodpecker, but unfortunately, I was not quick enough to photograph them.

So take a look at what March looks like in the Westermark woods: Continue reading

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

The Last Hurray of Winter and a Linkdump

On the cusp of spring, winter returned with a vengeance this weekend for one last hurray. I don’t know how long it will lastm but for now we have approx. five centimeters of snow. I took a bunch of photos, which you can see behind the cut, but for now have some links:

The New Yorker has an interesting article about a new female trickster figures, who manage to outwit the opposition, while still remaining psychologically and often physically fragile. This also ties into my earlier observation that the current trend for having fragile looking, willowy white women play tough as nails CIA agents almost strikes me as some kind of propaganda. “Look out, islamist terrorists, cause even our women can take you.”

At The Kenyon Review, Amy Boesky, now a professor of English literature, recounts how she ghostwrote Sweet Valley High novels as a grad student in the 1980s. I very likely read some of her books back in the day.

On Tuesday, popular German actor Dieter Pfaff died of cancer aged 65. His substantial figure was a frequent sight on German TV in the 1990s and 2000s. Also on Tuesday, Hugo Chavez, president of Venezuela, died, also of cancer. No link, because it’s nigh impossible to find something that is not biassed to the one or the other side.

And now the photos, taken at dawn to capture the untouched snow, hence everything looks a little twilighty: Continue reading

Posted in Books, General, Links | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Telegraph on Sex

Apparently, it’s “Let’s talk about sex scenes in fiction” week at the Telegraph, for there are no less than four current articles about literary sex.

First of all, Julian Barnes, poor dear, laments that modern authors are feeling the commercial obligation to write about sex. And the culprit is… no, not Fifty Shades of Grey but Lady Chatterly’s Lover – you know, the novel which was the subject of an obscenity trial in 1960 and has puzzled subsequent generations trying to figure out just what was supposed to be so damn shocking about it. Methinks Mr. Barnes is a tad behind the times.

Also at the Telegraph, Rowan Pelland, former editor of The Erotic Review, responds to Julian Barnes and complains that there is not a whole lot of sex in British fiction and that very little of it is good. Though Ms. Pelland agrees with Julian Barnes that erotic writing was better pre Lady Chatterly’s Lover, when it was still potentially illegal, and claims that erotica rarely flies off the shelves anymore. Uhm, Ms. Pelland must have missed the past year then, let alone the erotic romance boom of the past approx. eight years.

Jon Stock, writer of spy novels, also responds to Julian Barnes and focuses on a particular point, namely that plenty of people tend to assume that all sex scenes are autobiographic. Of course, no one ever assumes that crime writers have actual experience with killing people (except Richard Castle, of course, but then Castle is fiction), just as no one assumes that writers of epic fantasy have actual swordfighting experience (though some of them do) and that writers of grimdark fantasy have personally tried all the torture and execution techniques so lovingly described in their novels.

Katy Brand also responds to Julian Barnes and says that the French still writer better sex scenes than the British. I can’t speak for literature, but I generally prefer sex scenes in British films and TV shows to those in French films.

Finally, the Telegraph also gives us the top ten worst sex scenes in modern literature.

Posted in Books, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

More on Grimdark Fantasy

The latest reiteration of the debate about grimdark epic fantasy is happily chugging along. You can read my take (with lots of links) here. And now for a roundup of the latest responses:

Foz Meadows offers her take on the debate and points out that the supposed realism of grimdark fantasy is actually a very selective view of reality and one which all too often relegates women, people of colour and GLBT people to the status of victims or erases their existence altogether. Foz Meadows also makes the same point I made before, namely that the writers of grimdark epic fantasy are overwhelmingly straight white cisgender men.

Cheryl Morgan responds to Foz Meadows and also points out that dismissing happy endings for characters from marginalized groups as unrealistic denies readers from those marginalized groups the hope that things can and maybe someday will be better.

Now I don’t believe that Joe Abercrombie meant to say that since gritty epic fantasy portrays the world “as it is”, that automatically means that women only exist to be raped or abused, GLBT people only exist to be killed and people of colour often don’t exist at all. And indeed, Abercrombie pops up in the comments to agree with Foz Meadows. However, there are other authors of grimdark fantasy (cough – R. Scott Bakker – cough) who defend the prevalence of rape and general misogyny in their works with exactly this argument. “I’m only writing it because it’s realistic”.

Writer Jerol Johnson also responds to Joe Abercrombie’s post from the POV of someone who quite enjoys the grittier side of fantasy. What struck me most about this post was that Johnson includes three female writers (Robin Hobb, N.K. Jemisin and Cherie Priest) and at least one writer of colour in his list of writers of gritty fantasy. This is remarkable, because – as I’ve noted before – women and writers of colour are usually assumed not to write gritty fantasy, even if they do. Even more remarkable is that Cherie Priest does not write epic fantasy at all (gritty fantasy is usually assumed to be epic rather than some other mode of fantasy) but steampunk and urban fantasy.

Finally, here is an Italian response to Joe Abercrombie from writer Andrea Santucci. What I find most interesting about this post is Santucci’s assertion that gritty epic fantasy apparently does not exist in Italy or at least it doesn’t sell. Even George R.R. Martin isn’t very popular over there. Come to think of it, Martin wasn’t all that popular in Germany either, until Game of Thrones aired over here (on a channel mainly associated with crappy reality shows in a horrible “chunks of three or four episodes broadcast over a single weekend” format which meant that even people who might have enjoyed the show did not bother watching, because who has the time and the patience to sit in front of the TV for hours on end?) and the books started showing up on bookstore display tables and on the bestseller lists.

Posted in Books | Tagged , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Early March Linkdump

Aeon Magazine has a very good article by Damien Walter about the importance of creating a culture of creativity. Considering how you have to fight as a teacher to be allowed to bring a bit of creativity into your classes and how many students just plain don’t know what to do with it (apart from drawing penises) and how some of them blossom when allowed to be creative, this really resonated with me.

Linguist John McWorter claims that text-speak is not a symptom of the decline of the English (or any other) language, but a new way of writing like we speak. Found via Jay Lake. Of course, David Crystal has been saying something similar for years.

At Tor.com, Emily Asher-Perrin explores what happens when you watch the Star Wars prequels with the sound muted, i.e. without the often bad dialogue, and finds that the much maligned prequels are visually stunning. This post is a response to Camille Paglia’s recent assertion that George Lucas is the greatest visual artist of our time. Now that George Lucas isn’t skilled at handling dialogue and that he is a very good visual stylist aren’t exactly revolutionary insights. Nonetheless, it’s interesting how many of the moments I do like about the prequels are visual rather than dialogue related. Though that moment between Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan in The Phantom Menace does not mean what Emily Asher-Perrin thinks it means. Plus, she misses one of my personal favourites, the very end of Revenge of the Sith, when Obi-Wan takes baby Luke to Beru and Owen Lars, a scene that’s entirely without dialogue. Beru takes one look at baby Luke and her face literally lights up. Then she turns away, Luke clutched protectively to her chest, leaving Obi-Wan standing there, making it very clear that Obi-Wan will not get his hands on Luke while she and Owen live. This little moment explains Luke’s whole childhood right there and also redeems the Lars family, who in the original trilogy had appeared mostly as obstacles who try to keep Luke from his destiny. And that’s exactly what they do – only that they do it out of love and in an (ultimately ill-fated) attempt to prevent Anakin’s fate from repeating itself. It’s also striking how much those dialogueless scenes (not just Obi-Wan delivering baby Luke to the Lars family, but also Bail Organa bringing baby Leia home) manage to offer a hopeful ending to an otherwise bleak and hopeless movie. No matter how bad things may get in the new Empire (and seeing the Death Star in the very early phases of construction just moments before makes it clear that they are going to get very bad indeed), those two kids are loved and they’re going to be all right.

Talking of SF design, Ray Cusick, the BBC production designer who created the iconic Dalek design, died aged 84.

Posted in Film, Links, TV, Work | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

It’s that time of the year again: Grimdark Fantasy

We’re having our annual gritty fantasy debate, because Joe Abercrombie – being one of the prime purveyors of grimdark fantasy today – launches a preemptive strike and defends dark and gritty fantasy against its critics. Of course, nobody is actually criticizing grimdark fantasy this week, though there is a discussion going on whether epic fantasy is a conservative genre (Liz Bourke and John H. Stevens offer summaries at Tor.com and SF Signal respectively, while Shaun Duke responds to Liz Bourke at The World in the Satin Bag). But considering that criticisms of the relentless darkness of much of current fantasy and SF pop up every few months or so (I have added my two cents to some of the previous go-arounds in these pages), it’s only a matter of time until the next one. Continue reading

Posted in Books | Tagged , , , , | 14 Comments

More on the 2013 Oscars and the ugliness exemplified thereby

I finally found the interview with Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Žižek that I briefly mentioned in yesterday’s Oscar post. A German text version is here and the full interview (in English) is here.

Žižek echoes a concern I have had for more than ten years now, namely that various American films and TV shows about the “war on terror” have normalized torture to a point that torture is “just one of those unpleasant things we have to live with”. Though I wouldn’t put the blame just on Kathryn Bigelow (though it is troubling how Kathryn Bigelow went from the director of interesting action films like Point Break or Strange Days to the semi-official chronicler of the “war on terror”) and Homeland, much as I dislike either, but on 24. Because 24, which began in the fall of 2001, around the same time as the World Trade Center attacks, and included plenty of ugly and graphic torture scenes, particularly in its latter seasons. Not that graphic torture on TV was anything new in 2001, in the 1990s Star Trek – The Next Generation and Babylon 5 had both devoted entire episodes to their respective protagonists getting tortured – episodes I later learned to my horror were considered fan favourites. But the quality of torture in 24 was nonetheless new, because in 24 it was the supposed “good guy” doing the torturing.

And yes, I know that some people will think I’m the last person who should go all moral on other people for writing torture scenes, considering I write them myself on occasion. However, there is a big difference between my torture scenes and those in 24 or Homeland or Zero Dark Thirty, namely that in my works, only the bad guys torture. And besides, none of my torture scenes are set in the here and now, but either in the past or (not published yet) future.

However, as Žižek points out, there is a different quality to the torture scenes of Zero Dark Thirty and Homeland than to those in 24. Because in 24 and others of the same ilk or influenced by it (Lost and Torchwood included graphic torture scenes in an attempt to capture the coveted young male demographic), the torturers are almost exclusively men. Women stand by and occasionally try to utter “This is wrong” (though it’s stunning how no one in Lost or Torchwood says anything against the torture, though they are obviously disgusted by it, because the male leader figure is always right), but they don’t torture.

Today’s torturers, however, are very young, very thin, very blonde (or red-haired in the case of Jessica Chastain) and very white women. And they’re usually played by the least likely actress imaginable. Prior to Zero Dark Thirty, Jessica Chastain was mainly known for playing suburban housewives and mothers of the etheral Madonna type. Claire Danes was best known as a troubled teen from My So-Called Life. And Piper Perabo, whom I spotted in a trailer for something called Covert Affairs, which seems to be of the same ilk, was best known for playing a girl trying to make it in the big bad city without showing her boobies in Coyote Ugly. Now apparently the CIA agents who coordinated the hunt for Osama Bin Laden really were women. I sincerely doubt that they looked like Claire Danes or Jessica Chastain, however.

Personally, I wonder whether having willowy, fair-haired and fair-skinned western women hunt for the big bad terrorists isn’t some kind of “Fuck you” to islamists everywhere. “Look, you people are so pathetic that even a woman can take you. And not just any woman either, but a very white, very western woman played by the least likely actress imaginable.” And yes, this stuff is propaganda.

Also regarding this year’s Oscars, regular commenter Estara pointed me to this great post by Michelle Sagara West in response to the N.K. Jemisin post I linked to yesterday about the disgraceful treatment of 9-year-old Oscar nominee Quvenzhané Wallis. Come to think of it, I have seen similarly horrifying comments made about Sasha and Malia Obama when both of them were young enough that only a pedophile would think sexual thoughts about them. And yes, I don’t recall similar comments made about Chelsea Clinton or about young white girls nominated for Oscars such as Anna Paquin, Abigail Breslin and Hailey Steinfeld. In fact, I am now wondering whether Keisha Castle-Hughes, another young Oscar nominee of colour (though not black, but Maori) experienced a similarly disgraceful treatment.

Posted in Film | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Reflections on the 2013 Oscars

By popular demand, here is the annual Oscar reflections post.

I wasn’t actually sure whether I would be watching live this year or not, because of the time differences the Oscars tend to start in the middle of the night and generally last into the early hours of the morning. Besides, I wasn’t feeling all that well (that inflamed aphthous ulcer is somehow affecting my entire system and makes me feel tired all the time). Besides, as usual, I care very little about most of the nominated films and actively loathe several of them.

In the end, I decided to start watching and go to bed, once I got too bored or too angry to continue. Once the endless red carpet interviews were finally over (yes, the gowns are pretty, but do we need to spend approx. two hours of repetitive interviews to gawk at the same gowns on the same attractive women) and the show proper began, my first reaction upon seeing the host was, “Who the fuck is that guy?” Because I had honestly no clue who the earnestly grinning fellow was.

A quick glance at the TV guide revealed that this was one Seth MacFarlane, comedian and creator of the Family Guy adult cartoon and writer of Ted, last summer’s comedy about a very rude teddy bear. A look at IMDB also reveals that Mr. MacFarlane has loads of voice acting and writing credits for cartoons, mostly stuff like Dexter’s Lab, Johnny Bravo and Cow and Chicken, neither of which I ever liked. Oh yes, and he had a small part on Star Trek Enterprise. Still, with such credits you’d expect an Oscar host who knows what he’s doing and who would probably even manage to be funny. Unfortunately, Seth MacFarlane, in spite of his impressive credits, was no such thing. Continue reading

Posted in Film | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

The Evolution of the Crime Genre

The Independent has a nice article about how crime fiction has moved on from the days of the classic “whodunnit” mystery. The article begins by listing Ronald Knox‘s* ten rules for detective fiction from 1929. Now those rules were already horribly outdated when I first came across them in a university class on crime fiction some ten years ago, though one must compliment Knox for telling writers not to go for the racist solution a.k.a. the evil foreigner did it, especially since the racist solution is still alive and well in the 21st century. I just came across an example on NCIS tonight.

On a more general note, the article also explores how crime fiction has moved away from the pure puzzle aspects of the late 19th and early 20th century to a more psychological approach. Indeed, Kathryn Johnson, a British curator at the British Library quoted in the Independent article, says it best:

[…]the whodunit has evolved. It’s became a whydunit or a howdunit.

There is another dimension to the evolution of the crime genre that the Independent article only touches on very briefly, namely that the crime genre and its sister genre the thriller has not just evolved, it has splintered into several, culturally distinct strands to the point that the terms “crime fiction”, “mystery” and “thriller” don’t necessarily mean the same thing in different parts of the world.

This was brought home sharply to me, when I was asked to recommend some German crime fiction, preferably cozies or country house murder mysteries. My reply was, “Uhm, we don’t really have those subgenres in Germany, but I’ll see if I can come up with recommendations that are quirky and not too violent.”

It’s true, too, because traditional cozy mysteries in the US/UK mold (since most cozies are actually written and published in the US these days) don’t really exist in Germany these days. Meanwhile, the hardboiled and noir mode of crime fiction, while still very much en vogue in the US, is considered largely passé in Europe and only used for parodies and deliberately retro pieces. Of course, the whole corpus of Scandinavian crime fiction is often called “Nordic noir” in the English speaking world. But Scandinavian crime novels are not really noir in the US-sense of the word. Neither do they conform to the Anglo-American definition of thriller (which seems to be non-stop action), which explains the regular confused reactions of American readers to Stieg Larsson’s Millennium trilogy (“But it starts so slow.” “There’s so much unnecessary detail.”).

These national and cultural differences in defining genres and subgenres also regularly cause me problems in how to classify my own attempts at writing crime fiction and thrillers. As I state in the introduction to my crime fiction collection Murder in the Family, I’m obviously very much influenced by the German crime fiction – particularly the crime shorts published in the backpages of magazines – which poses a problem, because what Germans call “Krimi” (a sort of blanket term encompassing mysteries, crime fiction, suspense and thrillers) does not necessarily match Anglo-American definitions. None of the stories in Murder in the Family are mysteries in the traditional sense of the word nor are they detective fiction, though three of them do feature detectives. However, one detective has been dead for years and is only a memory by the time the story begins, another commits the murder himself and the third fails to solve the case. I can only imagine what Ronald Knox would think about that.

*Ronald Knox seems to have been a very interesting person BTW, a Catholic priest and theologian, who also wrote crime fiction and radio plays for the BBC, including a pre-War of the Worlds hoax play about Britain is the grasp of a revolution.

Posted in Books | Tagged , , , , , | 8 Comments